Sunday, November 18, 2012

Tom is the creepiest

I find that out of all the characters we have encountered that Tom Ripley is by far the weirdest. Like he is the strangest. I can understand every other character's motive for committing the crimes that they did, even though they were irrational they make sense. What adds to his mysteriousness is that fact that he is sexually ambiguous, and is strangely attracted to Dickie in a nonsexual kind of way. I think Patricia Highsmith was able to create such a peculiar character because she is a woman. In The Postman Always Rings Twice Cora said something to Frank about Nick that made me come to this conclusion. She stated that a man can never really know what it feels like to be in the presence of someone who is greasy, because a man could never understand the awkward feeling of someone making your skin crawl and stomach turn. I feel like female writers would be better at creating creepy characters because they know exactly what makes a man's personality and mannerisms particularly queer and unattractive. A guy writer can't really capture a creep in all his creepiness because he might not be able to capture and describe a disposition that turns people completely off.

7 comments:

  1. I totally agree that Highsmith had the advantage of being able to see a "creepiness" in men that a male writer wouldn't have necessarily been as exposed to. I also wonder about how much of Highsmith herself went into Ripley's characterization - could his motives be reflected in the author: a queer, forthright woman who must have felt a similar alienation?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I definitely agree with you. I'm not sure that the alienation was something that could have been brought in by anyone other than Highsmith, especially when one considers her reputation outside her writing. It sounds like she wasn't exactly a joy to deal with herself, so creating a strangely antisocial character seems to be a natural fit.

      Delete
  2. Highsmith has a very cold and precise recollection of traits for her character of Tom. It does really sound like a lot of herself is present in Tom, but the fact that she is a woman and can observe men from the outside may have something to do with the character's traits... though I think a lot of Tom's character has to do with her personification of herself as a male... I'm sure she felt as alienated and angry with the world as Tom seems to.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I definitely agree that the other characters we've come across in other books have clearer motives. In The Talented Mr. Ripley, it's so much more confusing. If we try to understand Tom's motives from his point of view, he could be seen as the victim in a way because of the humiliation he experiences. However, if we look at Tom and Dickie (and others) from an outsider's perspective, it really does seem like Tom's just weird and crazy. If you look at the shame he experiences, it's easy to overlook all the unusual things about him that might make others not like him. Like someone in class said, Dickie doesn't have to like him- Dickie could just as well act like that toward someone of his own class. It seems the main thing is that Tom is unable to express his anger toward Dickie in a rational way- whereas someone in Dickie's class could probably do so.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I also agree that Highsmith's point of view as a woman makes it easier for her to create a creep. I honestly hadn't really thought about it until I read this. I always tell my guy friends about creepy dudes and they can't believe the things I say. I think that women at times perceive things that guys find to be normal as creepy. I know I've told my guy friends to stop doing things because they're weird and they are completely baffled.. Very interesting point.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree the creepiness is really strange with Tom. When I think about it though I don't think it is the fact she is a women but that she is sexually ambiguous. She can recognize the certain qualities of each gender very well because she's been romantic with both. My sexually ambiguous friends that are boys I talk to very often would be able to point out the personality traits of boys the way Highsmith did most definitely. Being able to connect with both genders on a sexual level in some way gives them some kind of advantage in understand all people without taking into account their gender.

    ReplyDelete
  6. On a similar note, I recently found out that calling a guy a creep, creeper, or creepy is the harshest insult any woman can say to a man. Apparently dubbing someone a creep is so insulting that some men have created groups to stop "creep-shaming." According to feminist website, Jezebel.com, creep is harsher than other popular insults like "pussy" and insinuations about small penis size because creep is the only insult that takes a female-centric perspective and forces men to realize their own double-consciousness (something African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics, women, and so forth have been faced with for centuries)and how their behavior is perceived differently by women. It is a very interesting article, here is the link: http://jezebel.com/5903883/why-guys-really-hate-being-called-creepy

    ReplyDelete